July 1, 2022 Edible Cannabinoid Products Law Change
Ver. 7/20/2022
• Statute: Sec. 151.72 MN Statutes
These edibles must adhere to the following rules to be sold in Minnesota
• Service size must be 5mg or under
• Package must be 50mg total or under
• Mg is total THC (cannot have 5mg of Delta-9 and 5mg of Delta-8, the combination of THC has to
equal 5mg or less)
• CBD – has to be under 0.3% THC
• Cannot be sold in restaurants, bars or other businesses that prepare food and beverages onsite
or take away
• Cannot be sold to anyone under the age of 21
• Meet specific labeling and packaging requirements found in MSS 151.72
• Must not appeal to children (no cartoons, animals, etc.)
• Must not be modeled after a brand of products primarily consumed by or marketed to children
(candy, cereal, etc.)
• Must not resemble the trademarked, characteristic, or product-specialized packaging of any
commercially available food or product
• Must be packaged in a child-resistant, tamper-evident, and opaque container
• 50mg Package – must be divided by scoring, wrapping, or other indicators designating the
individual serving size of 5mg or less
• Impaired Driving:
Impairment is impairment Even though these edibles are legal, if you are impaired by the consumption of these candies or drinks, you can still be charged with a DUI.
Minnesotans for Safe Driving does not believe that this change in law was a good thing because these edibles contain a mood-altering substance (THC) and used with alcohol will increase the impairment exponentially.
Cannabis Use Among Drivers in Fatal Crashes in Washington State Before and After Legalization
This study examines marijuana involvement in fatal crashes in Washington State before and after recreational use of cannabis became legal in the state.
January 2020
Reasons why the legalization of Marijuana should not be passed
Alcohol and Marijuana
Although a growing number of states in the U.S. have legalized recreational use of marijuana, questions remain about when, how and what happens when marijuana is used in combination with other legal substances such as alcohol.
Do individuals substitute marijuana use for alcohol use or does the use of marijuana complement/increase the use of alcohol? What are the risks of simultaneous use of marijuana and alcohol? This brief report summarizes what is known and highlights areas where more research is needed.
Graphic: Lee CM, presented at 3rd Symposium on Marijuana Research in Washington, May 18, 2018. (11)
What is the Prevalence of Using Marijuana in Combination with Alcohol?
The 2016 U.S. National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) estimated that about half of people age 12 and over currently drink alcohol and about 9% currently use marijuana. (1) Among people who currently drink alcohol, estimates of co-use range from 10-27%. (2,3) Among people with an addiction to alcohol (Alcohol Use Disorder), estimates of co-use range from 23-58%. (2,4,5)
However, estimates of use and co-use may be higher for key populations, specifically, young adults. (2-4) More than 20% of people aged 18-29 currently use marijuana, and estimates of co-use range from 50-70%. (2,4,6)
Co-use of marijuana and alcohol may also be more likely for males (2,3,5,7), people of color (3,7), and people living on the West coast of the U.S. (8). People who live in states that have legalized recreational marijuana use may also be more likely to use it in combination with alcohol. For instance, a study of primary care patients in Washington State found prevalence of marijuana use (15%) and co-use with alcohol (27%) were both higher than national estimates. (2)
Patterns of Co-use of Alcohol and Marijuana
People who use both alcohol and marijuana may use them simultaneously (i.e. they use both substances at the same time), or concurrently (i.e. they use both alcohol and marijuana, but not at the same time). Simultaneous use is more common and is associated with greater alcohol consumption (4,7,9). People who use marijuana and alcohol at the same time may do so to increase their intoxication or because they are already intoxicated and are no longer making rational decisions about their drug use (10,11). It has also been suggested that people may substitute marijuana for alcohol to reduce drinking (12); however, the effectiveness of this type of substitution is not supported by research. (13)
There is evidence that substitution of marijuana for alcohol may occur as a response to policy changes, such as when tax on alcohol is raised (11). Policies that legalize the sale and use of marijuana may result in either substitution (decrease in alcohol, increase in marijuana) or complementary use (increase in both alcohol and marijuana), depending on other characteristics of the group studied. (11)
Risks of Co-use of Alcohol and Marijuana
Simultaneous use of alcohol and marijuana (aka “SAM”) is associated with greater harms than using either substance alone, including:
Driving under the influence of alcohol and marijuana is also much more dangerous than driving under the influence of either substance alone. (7) Research has shown that marijuana and alcohol both impairs driving in a dose-response manner, meaning the more you consume the more you impair your ability to drive (though the effect is smaller for marijuana than alcohol). (23) Alcohol and marijuana appear to have a synergistic effect on driving impairment, meaning they interact in a way that severely impairs our ability to drive (more than either one alone). (4) Consequently, the risk of being in a car accident is considerably greater for drivers impaired by both alcohol and marijuana.
Alcohol and Marijuana Use Disorders
People who are addicted to marijuana (e.g. continue to use marijuana even when they have symptoms or problems caused by their marijuana use, otherwise known as a Marijuana Use Disorder) are more likely to develop Alcohol Use Disorder. (4) Large population surveys have also shown that the vast majority of people who have Marijuana Use Disorder in their lifetime have also had Alcohol Use Disorder. (8,24)
What We Don’t Know
There is still a lot we must learn about the impact of using marijuana and alcohol at the same time. Most of the research to date on concurrent and simultaneous use of marijuana and alcohol has been done in populations of high school and college students. (4) There is a need for more research in the general adult population, as well as populations for whom use of marijuana and alcohol together may be especially risky (like pregnant women or individuals with psychiatric vulnerabilities such as serious mental illnesses).
There is also a lot more we need to learn about the outcomes with using alcohol and marijuana at the same time. Here are a few examples of important research questions:
Rererences
Citation: Alcohol and Marijuana Factsheet / by Julie E. Richards, MPH, PhD Candidate and Theresa E. Matson, MPH. June 2018. LearnAboutMarijuanaWA.org/factsheets/alcohol.htm
6/26/17 (NHTSA): Impact of the Legalization and Decriminalization of Marijuana on the DWI System: This comprehensive study completed by the Governor’s Highway Safety Administration (GHSA) in conjunction with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) examined marijuana laws and trends in states that have legalized marijuana, whether for medical or recreational uses, or both. The study focuses on states including Arizona, California, Colorado, Montana, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. http://www.ghsa.org/sites/defa
Passage of a law to legalize Marijuana would be dangerous to the driving public, dangerous to our state’s health and especially to our teens whose brains are still developing.
Those who say that Colorado’s “experiment” in legalizing marijuana proves it can be done safely with proper regulation don’t realize that in an experiment, one must control input variables and measure outcomes. Colorado does neither, so its dalliance with legalization cannot properly be termed an experiment. Although it regulates retail and “medical” cannabis stores, the July 9th Department of Revenue report shows that less than one-half of Colorado’s estimated 160 metric ton annual consumption of marijuana comes from regulated stores. Potency, purity or consumption of edibles, hash oil or other concentrates are not regulated. And measuring outcomes? The only outcome that is measured by the state is tax revenue, which is falling short of projections.
Driving under the influence of drugs, including marijuana, has never been measured by Colorado. Like most states, Colorado has a single statute number for DUI, whether it be caused by alcohol, drugs, or a combination of the two. There is simply no mechanism to track drug impairment, much less marijuana impairment on a statewide basis.
Recognizing that problem, this year the Colorado State Patrol began a manual collection of DUI-marijuana data, based upon officer’s beliefs about the cause of observed impairment. In six months, they wrote 349 citations for DUI where marijuana was believed to be a cause of impairment. Since the State Patrol issues less than 20% of the state’s DUI citations, one might infer a DUI-marijuana prevalence of 3,500 annually.
Unfortunately, there are few tools available to detect and/or measure DUI-marijuana, so the estimate of 3,500 is likely understated. Unlike alcohol’s impairment that is predominantly a physical impairment, marijuana’s impairment is predominantly mental. Less than 2% of Colorado’s officers are trained to recognize, document and testify to DUID based on symptoms unique to drug impairment. Standardized roadside tests designed to confirm alcohol impairment are only marginally successful identifying drug impairment, especially for chronic users.
For many reasons, blood tests that are so useful to confirm alcohol impairment are nearly useless to confirm marijuana impairment. Drugs or alcohol never impair blood, urine, or oral fluids. Only the brain is impaired. Blood testing is a surrogate for testing what’s in the brain. For alcohol, it’s a good surrogate; for drugs, much less so. There are three reasons for this:
Marijuana may be judged safer than alcohol because no one has died from taking marijuana. By that measure, it’s also safer than the bubble gum that choked Michael Jones to death. But it’s still not safe. And no one believes it’s safer than bubble gum. Marijuana causes driving impairment, and it causes deaths such as Tanya and Adrian Guevarra, killed by a driver who confessed to driving under the influence of marijuana after testing positive for 4 ng/ml of Delta 9 THC.
Pot proponents ask to have marijuana regulated like alcohol. But it’s not like alcohol. They could ask to have it regulated like bubble gum. But that doesn’t make it bubble gum, either.
Ed Wood
Ed Wood’s son, was killed by a driver driving under the influence of marijuana. Check out his website
Reprinted with permission